Post by Anderson, Charles RIs udp checksum offload enabled? If so, tcpdump/wireshark won't see
the actual checksum and assume it is bad.
I imagine it is theoretically offloaded. I DO have an 18.06.1 arm box
now up that IS
getting dhcpv6-pd from comcast....
This arm box IS getting dhcpv6-pd from comcast correctly.
***@gw1:~# cat /etc/openwrt_release
DISTRIB_ID='OpenWrt'
DISTRIB_RELEASE='18.06.1'
DISTRIB_REVISION='r7258-5eb055306f'
DISTRIB_TARGET='ipq806x/generic'
DISTRIB_ARCH='arm_cortex-a15_neon-vfpv4'
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='OpenWrt 18.06.1 r7258-5eb055306f'
DISTRIB_TAINTS=''
My mips and x86_64 boxes aren't.
Otherwise based on my 4+ year old memory of this stuff, I don't see
anything immediately wrong
with the solicit.
(I updated the bug, too)
Post by Anderson, Charles RPost by Dave Tahthmm... bad udp checksum???
:/tmp# 09:12:17.404257 IP6 (flowlabel 0xdfff4, hlim 1, next-header UDP
(17) payload length: 159) fe80::20d:b9ff:fe43:a06c.546 >
ff02::1:2.547: [bad udp cksum 0x58f4 -> 0xc4a1!]
Post by Dave TahtPost by Dave TahtHere you go! Going to go look at the firewall rules in a sec....
I changed the rules to allow 547 and 546, no difference. I even
flushed the ipv6tables rules entirely,
and I'm running without that for a while. I can certainly imagine
comcast's dhcpv6 server giving up on me....
It's nice to know, btw, someone is still messing with homenet. Having
zero funding for
too many years burned me out on even trying. But I expected ipv6 to
keep working without
any more help from me! :(
Post by Dave TahtPost by Mikael AbrahamssonPost by Dave TahtSigh. Once upon a time I used to test this stuff on comcast. So I
finally got around to deploying
a new 18.06 gateway and ipv6 is busted with comcast.
Can you please email me output from "tcpdump -n -vvv -i <wan> port 546 or
port 547 or icmp6" as your WAN is trying to get DHCPv6-PD ? Or if you dump
that to a pcap and email it to me (or make it available somewhere for me
to download).
I have 18.06.1 working with homenet on WRT1200AC,dual uplinks (two
different vlans on WAN), getting dual stack from both ISPs, /56 from both,
and both are announced out on LAN. I even configured bidirectional SQM
with CAKE on each uplink (250/50 and 250/100 respectively) and it seems to
do the right thing.
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619